The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), also known as H.R. 3261, is a bill that was introduced in the United States House of Representatives on October 26, 2011, by Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX) and a bipartisan group of 12 initial co-sponsors. The bill expands the ability of U.S. law enforcement and copyright holders to fight online trafficking in copyrighted intellectual property and counterfeit goods.[2] Now before the House Judiciary Committee, it builds on the similar PRO-IP Act of 2008 and the corresponding Senate bill, the Protect IP Act.[3]The bill would allow the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as copyright holders, to seek court orders against websites accused of enabling or facilitating copyright infringement. Depending on who requests the court orders, the actions could include barring online advertising networks and payment facilitators such as PayPal from doing business with the allegedly infringing website, barring search engines from linking to such sites, and requiring Internet service providers to block access to such sites. The bill would make unauthorized streaming of copyrighted content a felony. The bill also gives immunity to Internet services that voluntarily take action against websites dedicated to infringement, while making liable for damages any copyright holder who knowingly misrepresents that a website is dedicated to infringement.[4]Proponents of the bill say it protects the intellectual property market and corresponding industry, jobs and revenue, and is necessary to bolster enforcement of copyright laws especially against foreign websites.[5] Opponents say that it infringes on First Amendment rights, is Internet censorship,[6] will cripple the Internet,[7] and will threaten whistle-blowing and other free speech.[8]
All the supporters of the bill are turning their backs to it now. It's not going anywhere.
Quote from: omniconsumer on January 18, 2012, 09:05:20 PMAll the supporters of the bill are turning their backs to it now. It's not going anywhere.YAY!!! =D
Quote from: ZenPhire-KauaiBoi on January 19, 2012, 12:07:43 AMQuote from: omniconsumer on January 18, 2012, 09:05:20 PMAll the supporters of the bill are turning their backs to it now. It's not going anywhere.YAY!!! =Dthere's still PIPA (the protect IP act) that was going strong last time i heard of it.. And that was 2 days ago
Quote from: Evoke on January 19, 2012, 06:08:21 PMQuote from: ZenPhire-KauaiBoi on January 19, 2012, 12:07:43 AMQuote from: omniconsumer on January 18, 2012, 09:05:20 PMAll the supporters of the bill are turning their backs to it now. It's not going anywhere.YAY!!! =Dthere's still PIPA (the protect IP act) that was going strong last time i heard of it.. And that was 2 days agoWill probably suffer a Veto. Gooooooo Obama!
Even though the precise terms of ACTA remain undecided, the negotiants' preliminary documents reveal many troubling aspects of the proposed agreement" such as removing "legal safeguards that protect Internet Service Providers from liability for the actions of their subscribers" in effect giving ISPs no option but to comply with privacy invasions.